{"id":21514,"date":"2013-01-18T17:42:53","date_gmt":"2013-01-19T01:42:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.feeling.com.mx\/site\/?p=21514"},"modified":"2013-01-18T22:29:25","modified_gmt":"2013-01-19T06:29:25","slug":"el-mundo-condena-mentira-de-armstrong","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.feeling.com.mx\/site\/21514\/el-mundo-condena-mentira-de-armstrong.html","title":{"rendered":"El mundo condena mentira de Armstrong"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"Lance Armstrong confes\u00f3 por primera vez que se dop\u00f3 en cada uno de los siete Tour de France de ciclismo que gan\u00f3, pero el mundo mira la \u00abgran mentira\u00bb lleno de escepticismo y expectante ante la segunda parte de la entrevista que se emite hoy.<\/p>\n

En el primer minuto de la primera parte de la entrevista con Oprah Winfrey y con apenas cinco monos\u00edlabos, Armstrong, de 41 a\u00f1os, ya hab\u00eda dicho todo lo que hab\u00eda negado durante m\u00e1s de una d\u00e9cada. \u00bfTom\u00f3 sustancias prohibidas? \u00abS\u00ed\u00bb \u00bfEPO? \u00abS\u00ed\u00bb \u00bfTransfusiones de sangre? \u00abS\u00ed\u00bb \u00bfTestosterona, hormona de crecimiento o cortisona? \u00abS\u00ed\u00bb \u00bfLo hizo en todos y cada uno de los Tours de France que gan\u00f3? \u00abS\u00ed\u00bb.<\/p>\n

\u00abTras la entrevista, Armstrong resulta a\u00fan menos simp\u00e1tico\u00bb, titul\u00f3 un comentario el diario \u00abUSA Today\u00bb. \u00abUno casi se pregunta si es humano, si tiene idea de la diferencia entre el bien y el mal\u00bb, agreg\u00f3 antes de llamar al exciclista \u00abengre\u00eddo y cortante, fr\u00edo y sin sentimientos\u00bb. El diario \u00abThe New York Times\u00bb lament\u00f3 que la entrevista fuera \u00abextra\u00f1amente baja en energ\u00eda y en emoci\u00f3n\u00bb.<\/p>\n

\u00abNo es s\u00f3lo un deportista que minti\u00f3 sobre el uso de drogas; era el canalla mentiroso en una de las grandes historias de amor de Estados Unidos\u00bb, a\u00f1adi\u00f3 \u00abNYT\u00bb. Muchos dudan que Armstrong, sancionado de por vida por la UCI en octubre de 2012, contara toda la verdad.<\/p>\n

\u00abDeber\u00eda haber ido a la USADA (Agencia Antidoping de Estados Unidos) y contarlo todo de la A a la Z, no hay manera de que cometiera \u00e9l solo semejante fraude\u00bb, pidi\u00f3 Betsy Andreu, una de las aludidas en la entrevista tras ser una de las primeras en denunciar que Armstrong, que compart\u00eda equipo con su marido Frankie Andreu, se dop\u00f3. \u00abEst\u00e1 protegiendo a gente\u00bb.<\/p>\n

Lo mismo que Betsy piensan en Francia. No se puede tener \u00abun sistema (de doping) tan altamente desarrollado como el que describi\u00f3 la USADA sin que nadie te haya ayudado\u00bb, remarc\u00f3 Pierre Bordry, quien fuera durante los tiempos de Armstrong jefe de la Agencia Antidoping Francesa (AFLD).<\/p>\n

La ministra de Deportes del pa\u00eds galo, Val\u00e9rie Fourneyron, critic\u00f3 que \u00abla manipulaci\u00f3n contin\u00fae\u00bb y se mostr\u00f3 esc\u00e9ptica sobre la forma en que fue realizada la confesi\u00f3n. \u00abFue una puesta en escena perfectamente preparada, en la que recibimos apenas una m\u00ednima confesi\u00f3n del mismo hombre que nos hab\u00eda asegurado a los ojos que nunca hizo trampa\u00bb, dijo.<\/p>\n

La USADA consider\u00f3 la confesi\u00f3n un \u00abpeque\u00f1o paso en la direcci\u00f3n correcta\u00bb, pero pide m\u00e1s al texano. \u00abSi es sincero en su deseo de corregir sus errores pasados, testificar\u00e1 bajo juramento sobre toda la dimensi\u00f3n de sus actividades de doping\u00bb, expres\u00f3 Travis Tygart, jefe ejecutivo de la USADA.<\/p>\n

\u00abSu decisi\u00f3n de enfrentarse a su pasado es un paso importante en el largo camino para recuperar la confianza en el deporte\u00bb, se\u00f1al\u00f3 el presidente del ente internacional, Pat McQuaid, tambi\u00e9n en el punto de mira en el \u00abcaso Armstrong\u00bb por presunto uso de sustancias ilegales.<\/p>\n

\u00abArmstrong confirm\u00f3 que no hubo tests positivos que fueran encubiertos y que las donaciones que hizo a la UCI fueron para ayudar en la lucha contra el doping\u00bb, dijo McQuaid.<\/p>\n

El Comit\u00e9 Ol\u00edmpico Internacional (COI), que el jueves retir\u00f3 a Armstrong la medalla de bronce de Sydney 2000, habl\u00f3 de \u00abun d\u00eda muy triste para el deporte\u00bb e inst\u00f3 al ex corredor a que presente \u00abtodas las evidencias que tiene a las autoridades antidoping apropiadas para que se pueda poner fin a este episodio oscuro\u00bb.<\/p>\n

\u00abNo puede haber espacio para el doping en el deporte y el COI condena las acciones de Armstrong y de todo aquel que busca una ventaja injusta con el uso de drogas\u00bb, reiter\u00f3 el m\u00e1ximo organismo deportivo internacional.<\/p>\n

El ciclista brit\u00e1nico David Millar, otro que confes\u00f3 haberse dopando, cree que las palabras de Armstrong son buenas para el deporte, aunque sospecha que se trate de una especulaci\u00f3n. \u00abNo hubo sorpresas. Est\u00e1 jugando un juego t\u00e1ctico. As\u00ed es Lance\u00bb, dijo hoy Millar durante un coloquio sobre doping en Madrid. \u00abPero es bueno para el ciclismo. Necesitamos cerrar el cap\u00edtulo de aquella \u00e9poca\u00bb.<\/p>\n

El serbio Novak Djokovic, n\u00famero uno del tenis mundial, ve al texano como \u00abuna verg\u00fcenza para el deporte\u00bb. \u00abEs una desgracia para el deporte tener un atleta como \u00e9l\u00bb, dijo hoy el serbio tras avanzar a los octavos de final del Abierto de Australia.<\/p>\n

\u00abLe hizo trampa al deporte, le hizo trampa a mucha gente en todo el mundo con su carrera, con su historia de vida. Creo que deber\u00edan quitarle todos los t\u00edtulos, porque no es justo para ning\u00fan deportista. Simplemente no es la manera de ser exitoso, as\u00ed que creo que debe sufrir por todas sus mentiras en estos a\u00f1os\u00bb.<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=juVzHD7NEgk<\/p>\n

Nota Original: El Universal Venezuela<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"Despite years of vehement and even vicious denials, cyclist Lance Armstrong used performance-enhancing substances to help him win his seven Tour de France titles.<\/p>\n

Yet even with the near-universal possession of this knowledge, not to mention leaked confirmation that during a recent interview with Winfrey, Armstrong finally admitted doping, OWN’s \u00abOprah and Lance Armstrong: The Worldwide Exclusive\u00bb on Thursday night was possibly the most anticipated television special since last year’s second presidential debate, before which Americans wondered if President Obama was going to allow Mitt Romney to clean his clock a second time. <\/p>\n

Seriously, who else could so successfully leverage an interview with a disgraced sports star in which the big \u00abget\u00bb is him admitting what everyone already knows in a manner everyone anticipates — he did it, he’s sorry, he takes full responsibility? Peter Jackson may be getting three movies out of \u00abThe Hobbit,\u00bb but Oprah got two nights and 150 minutes out of Lance Armstrong.<\/p>\n

For days now, the interview has obsessed virtually every media outlet in the country. Sportswriters slammed Armstrong for choosing to confess to sympathetic Mom (Oprah) rather than stern and righteous Dad (sportswriters); news organizations questioned OWN’s decision to withhold the details of an important news story long enough for Americans to locate OWN on the upper reaches of their cable channels, while media pundits heralded the return of Winfrey to active pop-culture duty.<\/p>\n

One interview, 75 different ways to cover it. Honestly, even after all these years, the woman’s media moxie just takes your breath away.<\/p>\n

From the minute the cameras began to roll, it was clear that this worldwide exclusive was going to be as much an unveiling of a re-tuned Winfrey as it was of a robotically contrite Armstrong. Though she was wearing light blue and her hair soft — shoulder-length ringlets — Oprah was all business, instantly establishing Armstrong’s guilt by rattling off a series of questions to which he could only answer \u00abyes\u00bb or \u00abno.\u00bb They were all about whether he had used performance-enhancing substances and the answer to each and every one was \u00abyes.\u00bb <\/p>\n

Eschewing any of her usual stage craft — the comfy couches, the high-gloss sets –Winfrey taped the interview in a nondescript Austin, Texas, hotel room, which, along with multiple cut-aways to clips detailing the timeline of accusations, investigations and denials, gave the interview a dressed-down newsy feel, far more \u00ab60 Minutes\u00bb than \u00abSuper Soul Sunday.\u00bb<\/p>\n

Aware, no doubt, that she would be perceived by some as a safe choice for Armstrong, Oprah spent many of the first 90 minutes rather obsessively establishing the dimensions of his transgressions — had he forced his teammates to dope? (no, though he copped to influencing them, perhaps heavily), had he doped mid-race? (possibly), had he intentionally defamed those who spoke out about his drug use? (yes) — before dipping into the psychology of a career that Armstrong now calls \u00abone big lie.\u00bb But even entering the more traditional \u00abO\u00bb zone — did he feel guilty? (no) did he think of himself as a cheater? (no) was he afraid he would get caught? (no) does he feel ashamed now at how he behaved (yes) — Winfrey maintained a level of aloof sternness rather than emotional connection.<\/p>\n

Compared with the heat of a similar interview with author James Frey after much of his \u00abmemoir\u00bb was revealed to be fiction, the Armstrong interview was a surprisingly coldblooded affair, in part because Armstrong himself appeared chronically, perhaps even psychotically, detached, speaking at times as if from a script about a guy he once knew and sounding no more, or less, convincing than he did when lying his head off in earlier interviews. (Also, and perhaps more important, Armstrong had never come on her show and lied directly to her, a sin most of us find difficult to forgive.)<\/p>\n

Los Angeles Times<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Lance Armstrong confes\u00f3 por primera vez que se dop\u00f3 en cada uno de los siete Tour de France de ciclismo que gan\u00f3, pero el mundo mira la \u00abgran mentira\u00bb lleno de escepticismo y expectante ante la segunda parte de la entrevista que se emite hoy. En el primer minuto de la primera parte de la entrevista con Oprah Winfrey y con apenas cinco monos\u00edlabos, Armstrong, de 41 a\u00f1os, ya hab\u00eda…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":21519,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[25,24],"tags":[7316,4884,816,7315],"views":190,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.feeling.com.mx\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21514"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.feeling.com.mx\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.feeling.com.mx\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.feeling.com.mx\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.feeling.com.mx\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21514"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.feeling.com.mx\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21514\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.feeling.com.mx\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21519"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.feeling.com.mx\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.feeling.com.mx\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.feeling.com.mx\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}